天將降大任於斯國也﹐必先下其大雪﹐撞其火車﹐搶其火炬﹐ 震其國土﹐漲其物價﹐跌其股市﹐空乏其民﹐增益其所不能也。

China on road for a more open media policy?

My recent trip to Hong Kong and China have me rethinking a lot of issues. Let me start with the latest thing first.

I was in Xian when the mega earthquake struck Sichuan last Monday, just 600 km off the quake centre. Over 100 were killed in the northern part of Xian. Luckily, I was travelling in the eastern part at the time of the quake. I didn't even feel it. Our tour guide was notified of the earthquake at around 2:45pm. None of us in the tour group thought it was something THAT big. I was still joking: "Oh, lucky that I have all my valuables -- camera and lenses -- and personal IDs with me."

At dinner time, our tour guide said premier Wen Jiabao was heading to the quake zone. It was not common for an official that high to go to a disaster zone within such a short time. It was only then we realized something unusual had happened.

When we were back at the hotel in the evening, we noticed the walls of our rooms were cracked and doors shifted. I was told the hotel was evacuated in the afternoon. CCTV was already broadcasting live around the clock.

As the world has already seen, China has opted for an extremely open attitude for foreign media coverage of the quake. The most impressive change I observe is that the Hong Kong media -- mainly TV -- have been covering EMBEDDED with the relief army. Reporters were allowed to board helicopters, rescue boats and made first-hand coverage. In the past, only CCTV would be able to cover WITH the officials. This is of monumental significance to a more open media policy of China, if it really is changing. This is also of stark difference to how China handled foreign media coverage of the Tibet riots in March. I wrote back then:

.... I do think China is unwise to expell all foreign reporters, including Hong Kong's who are usually seen as "part of the family". I read reports from various sources that at least during the initial phase of the crackdown, the para-military and cops were ordered to exercise extreme restraint and not to "fight back even being attacked". At least one western tourist's report said that the first casualty in the crackdown could very possibly be that of a young Chinese cop.

If the authorities have given such an order, they should have allowed foreign reporters to shoot some pictures of the dead cops. Again, as I said previously, it's a cultural thing that China has to catch up with learning about the rules of game in world politics and propaganda. Take the initial phase of the US invasion of Iraq for example, the Bush administration has successfully conveyed a message to the world that the US was really fighting a "war on terror". They did this by allowing embedded reporters to cover the war in a highly restrictive fashion... no matter how, they were able to control the messages publicized to their advantage (at least during the first few weeks of the war).

quake1

The Washington Post reports that the party did ask the state-owned media to refrain from covering the quake, but was largely ignored by most media outlets who are facing ever-increasing competition after the commercialization of the industry in the 90s.

This week's expansive coverage of the disaster, however, has mobilized a tearful public to donate blood, money and labor, while also giving the nation a good look at the scope of the problem, from scores of collapsed schools to a desperate need for doctors. The coverage has also encouraged citizens to raise questions about the rescue effort, worrying government officials who prefer to control the narrative themselves.

"We know the directives from the propaganda department exist, but if the leadership finds that greater openness serves their interests, maybe they'll reconsider how they handle these things generally," said David Bandurski, a researcher with the China Media Project at Hong Kong University. "If we talk about the media being on a leash, it's still true, but the leash has been lengthened."

...

"The transparency of information can unite everybody to fight against the big tragedy," said Min Dahong, a journalism professor at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. "This is a good opportunity to establish a system that will encourage the press to report in a timely and open manner. I think the government learned a lesson from the snowstorm coverage."

Not only was the media enjoy freer reporting and commentary, the central government also seems to be responding to the media calls too. China has just announced the Olympic Torch relay will be suspended during a three-day mourning for the 1-week anniversary of the Sichuan earthquake.

(Washington Post) The Web site of the Beijing-based financial magazine Caijing carried an editorial Thursday by Huang Fuping, a former deputy editor in chief of the People's Daily, challenging officials' decision to continue the Olympic torch relay in the wake of the recent tragedy.

"Right now the Olympic torch relay is in Jiangxi province, and there still are 27 provinces to go and thousands of torchbearers waiting," Huang wrote. "Under these circumstances, the strategy of the torch relay of the Beijing Olympic Games should be adjusted. It should be suspended between the provinces. After decisive progress has been made in the rescue effort, then we should pass the torch directly from the affected areas of the quake to Beijing."

The same day, the Shanghai Securities News demanded the construction of buildings better able to withstand earthquakes and an end to the corruption that has resulted in shoddily built schools. "If buildings were constructed strictly according to proper standards, most of the buildings should survive an earthquake like the one in Wenchuan, and the casualties wouldn't be so numerous," the paper said in an editorial, noting that 95 percent of earthquake casualties are caused by the collapse of buildings.

In a particularly dramatic piece of coverage, Chinese TV viewers earlier this week watched as a CCTV news anchor, Zhao Pu, struggled to compose himself as he reported on the earthquake. He was widely praised for showing emotion, unlike many of the staid, rigid anchors on state-controlled TV.

"Zhao's tears make the cold face of CCTV warm," said an anonymous poster on Tianya, a popular Chinese Internet forum.

A journalist with The Telegraph was surprised by the "freedom" enjoyed by the press:

Of course with the Beijing Olympics less than three months away, it is in the interest of China’s leaders to act in a way that will win the approval of their many critics overseas. Nevertheless, western journalists in China, long used to operating under reporting restrictions, have been amazed by the freedom they have been allowed in covering the disaster. When I found myself standing five metres from Hu Jintao in Beichuan Middle School on Friday, it seemed like unprecedented access.

...

But if the government has learned some lessons since then, the reaction of ordinary Chinese to the crisis is also an insight into how the country has changed in recent years. On the way out of Beichuan on Friday, photographer Natalie Behring and I hitched a ride with four young Chinese from Mianyang who were driving up and down the road to Beichuan, distributing water to people in urgent need of it. They did it with the blessing and financial support of their employers, but it was their idea. Thirty years ago, individual initiative like that was not only unknown, it was dangerous.

The Economist notices:

The Chinese media note that the government's decision to allow prompt coverage follows the implementation on May 1st of new rules on “government information transparency”. Under these rules, the authorities are supposed to make public any information involving the “vital interests of citizens”. But political calculations are likely to have played a bigger role than the regulations themselves, which still allow information to be withheld if it relates to “state secrets”—a term applied sweepingly in China.

Like it or not, China is trying to adapt. The Olympic year offers the best timing for it is under mounting international pressure for a more open China. Perhaps once tried, China wouldn't want to go back. It's high time for the world to be a little more encouraging.

[Read More....]

Sales drop but prices continue to rise April 2008

BCREA release - British Columbia Real Estate Association reports residential sales dollar volume on the Multiple Listing Service® (MLS®) in BC dipped 1.4% to $4.1 billion in April, compared to April 2007. Residential unit sales declined 11% to 8,623 units during the same period. The average MLS® residential price in the province reached $478,044, up 11% from April 2007.

“Rising inventories are providing more choice for consumers and exerting less upward pressure on home prices,” said Cameron Muir, BCREA Chief Economist. Active MLS® residential listings in the province were up 37% to 47,923 units in April. “The combination of a slower pace of home sales and some profit taking by investors is contributing to a balance between housing demand and the supply of homes for sale.”

“While homebuyers now face less competition for the homes available for sale,” added Muir, “competition among home sellers means curb appeal, interior condition and prudent pricing are necessary for faster sale.”

In the first four months of the year, MLS® residential sales volume in the province fell 1.8% to $13.2 billion compared to the same period in 2007. Residential unit sales declined 13% to 27,730 units, while the average MLS® residential price increased 13% to $474,993.

[Read More....]

CMHC: Lower Mainland housing markets moderating

CMHC release - Following a year of near-record new home starts and existing home sales, the Metro Vancouver housing market will moderate slightly in 2008 and 2009, according to the Housing Market Outlook report released today by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). Home prices will rise, but at a slower pace than in recent years, as an increasing supply of both new and existing homes for sale give buyers more choice and more time to make their purchasing decision.

"Steady job growth and population growth, along with continuing low mortgage rates, will support demand for new and resale housing in Metro Vancouver," said Robyn Adamache, senior market analyst with CMHC. "However, softening consumer sentiment and high mortgage carrying costs will temper the effects of these positive factors, dampening homebuyer demand from the red hot pace of the past few years."

Eastward in the Abbotsford CMA, slowdowns in full-time job growth will lower demand for homeownership in the region. Housing starts will be near 2007 levels as new developments that have been in the planning stage begin breaking ground this year. However, lower housing demand will also weaken sales in both 2008 and 2009, despite population growth. Expect pressures to be placed on the rental market in the Abbotsford CMA, as the propensity for new migrants is to rent first before venturing into ownership.

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has been Canada's national housing agency for more than 60 years. CMHC is committed to helping Canadians access a wide choice of quality, affordable homes, while making vibrant, healthy communities and cities a reality across the country.

[Read More....]

To the western media: why offended?

Hi guys, I'm back from my vacation. Time to start blahing again :)

I know this sounds a little off now but since I've already written it, I'd love to post it here too. After my interview with the Macleans on the subject of Tibet was published in April, I received, through friends, questions from a columnist of a local newspaper. I replied him with a long email on April 19, as follows.

------------------

From the columnist:

Thank you for forwarding this. But I wonder how the Taiwanese friends of this "influential blogger" would feel about their baseball team's chances in the Olympics if China decided to invade Taiwan? And could she please tell me the body count for those innocent "Han Chinese" that have been killed as opposed to Tibetan protesters? And how exactly she knows that everyone in the Chinese community (as opposed to, I suppose, the Canadian community) is uniformly against the protests?
I look forward to your reply.



My reply:

First of all, I didn't proclaim I was any "influential blogger". I didn't say it. There's no need to pick on it.

I wonder if you are aware that in a recent poll done by Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council shows that 89% of Taiwanese agree that Taiwan and China should conditionally open up direct transportation links; 41.5% of respondents want Taipei to loosen restrictions for Taiwanese investment in China (which is a record high in years); 81.7% now believe that "One country, two systems" might be applicable to Taiwan (also highest since 2004); only 6% want independence asap and only 1.7% want unification asap; the majority wants to keep the status quo -- including "status quo now/decision later" (43.5%), "status quo indefinitely" (20%), "status quo now, independence later" (17.1%),"status quo now, unification later" (10.5%). While 75.1% support Taipei to develop more foreign ties even if that would lead to rising tension on cross-strait relation, 35.2% believe cross-strait exchanges are too slow (also a record high). Taiwan is not seeking independence now in the way the West may have wished. While the Taiwanese want to have more exposure in diplomacy, they also believe it's crucial to develop better economic ties with China.

Taiwan's vice president in waiting Vincent Siew and PRC head of state Hu Jintao had a much anticipated "historic" meeting in Hainan last week, which was seen as the "best time in 60 years" in cross-strait relations. The two sides agree to fasten direct transportation, to allow mainland tourists and investment to Taiwan. That's the picture in Taiwan. Please don't fantacize that every Taiwanese would take a combative stand against China as the West may have wished.

With that background, you think the Taiwanese are worried about a Chinese invasion?

You asked about my Taiwanese friends. My friend has been a "green" supporter (for an independent Taiwan) for her entire life. And even she agrees this time that only a better cross-strait relation would bring better economic future for Taiwan. She sincerely told me that her "green" friends wanted to have a successful Olympic and they definitely wished to see the Taiwanese baseball team winning a gold medal. What's wrong with that?

I don't know the body counts for "those innocent Han Chinese" in the recent Tibet riot, neither did I say in the Macleans interview that I knew. What I tried to point out is that the West should not be so "automatic" in accepting whatever the Tibet camp says. There should be some reflection by both sides. I also wrote in another post that I'm worried about the recent rise of patriotism in China and I see that as dangerous.

I said in my interview with Macleans that "so far I haven't heard anyone in the Chinese Canadian community who isn't angry or disgusted by all those violent protests". "I haven't heard" doesn't mean I know definitively *each and every person* in the community doesn't like the protests. "I haven't heard" means that's what I learnt from people I know, from voices I heard from "opinion leaders" (including self-proclaimed's) and commentators, messages left on my blog and other online forums, as well as callers to local radio phone-ins... all show very similar sentiments towards the disruption of the torch run. Of course you can always find people in the community who think otherwise, I was only telling what I knew.

Also, many people ask: why now? Why didn't the activists launch a mega protest before Beijing was awarded the Olympics 8 years ago? If the protesters are really against China "only" and not the Olympics, that should be the place they vent their anger, not robbing the torch from innocent atheletes. Plus, if they choose to protest now, why can't they protest peacefully?

Don't get me wrong, I do believe China needs to do a lot to better its human rights record. As I said in here.

I am just trying to open up more dialogue, hoping that by airing "the other side of the story" may kick-start the western media to do more research on the history of China and Tibet before taking everything the Free Tibet activists (and to a large extent too, the Falun Gong) say as granted without casting any doubts. While it's all legitimate for the media to be cynical about the credibility of whatever the Chinese government says (as they expelled all foreign reporters), they should also doubt the information offered by other opposite side. Isn't that something journalists should be doing? I don't understand why so many colleagues in the western media are offended by this.

You might want to take a look at the following articles on "the other side of the story": (note that not including pro-Tibet stuff here doesn't mean I ignore them. I consider that pro-Tibet voices have been well heard and well received that I don't need to remind you here)



BONUS:

A friend of mine, Eric, also wants me to pass along his messages to you:
The West, or at least the right wing of the west, keeps geo-politicizing their value system. Somehow they believe that supporting a geographic region against another geographic region is about values.

The last time they carried that belief out they invaded Iraq. We were promised a stable and democratic Middle East. But I have seen nothing but a disaster yet!

This time it is China against Tibet and China against Taiwan.

People in Taiwan must be very surprised to learn that they are given the assignment of standing up to China for the assertion of Western values. But judging from the result of the last election, it is a loud and clear NO, we do not want to do that.

Just like Tibet, Nepal is a source of fantasy for many westerners. But possible none of them would have fantasized that those brutal and terrorist- like Maoists would have won in an election. But they just did that. The people of Nepal chose not to live according to the fantasy of the West.

If the message is not clear, let me repeat it here: geo-politicizing western values does not work! And most people in the world have rejected that! In case the West has not noticed.

[Read More....]

Time off...

hi guys, i'm going on vacation tmw... will be less productive but will try to write if there're big things out there. will be in hong kong perhaps may check out the olympic torch run too :P

[Read More....]

Chinese Canadian 150 years culture online project launched

CCNC release - The Chinese Canadian National Council (CCNC) is proud to present the Chinese Canadian 150 Years Culture Online Project (CC150).

This exciting new online project showcases writers, musicians, videographers and artists in the Chinese Canadian community. The new website at www.ccnc.ca/cc150 brings together a special collection of exceptional work, based on the theme of 150 years of continuous Chinese community in Canada with many submissions from youth. There are more than 40 new works presented, with the majority from young Chinese Canadians.

“Through this community-based effort, we hope to provide a venue to share our experiences and our stories and to instill pride and cultural understanding,” Colleen Hua, CCNC National President said today. “With Asian Heritage Month just around the corner, we encourage the public and Chinese Canadian communities to connect, interact and to build understanding and respect for diversity.”

Objectives of the Chinese Canadian 150 Years Culture Online Project:

  • To showcase Chinese Canadian perspectives and experiences from across the country
  • To enrich and educate everyone about the diverse Chinese Canadian cultures and histories
  • To be welcoming of youth participation
  • To build stronger relationships between communities and groups across Canada and abroad
  • To celebrate 150 years of continuous Chinese community in Canada
Features of the Chinese Canadian 150 Years Culture Online Project:
  • A special anthology of stories written by or about Chinese Canadians
  • A unique music and short video collection by Chinese Canadians
  • A showcase of Chinese Canadian artists
  • A one-stop resource page of relevant events and websites

[Read More....]

BC home sales down in Q1 2008

BCREA - British Columbia Real Estate Association (BCREA) reports residential sales dollar volume on the Multiple Listing Service® (MLS®) in BC dipped 1.8% to $8.9 billion during the first quarter, compared to the same period in 2007. Residential unit sales declined 13.5% to 18,635 units during the same period. The average MLS® residential price in the province reached $478,423, up 13.5% from the first quarter of 2007.

“The housing market lost some steam during the first quarter,” said Cameron Muir, BCREA Chief Economist. “Eroding affordability has squeezed some potential buyers out of the market, while uncertainty about the duration and impact of a weak US economy and housing recession likely has some consumers sitting on the sidelines.”

“Despite weakness in the forest sector, economic fundamentals in the province remain strong and continue to underpin housing demand,” added Muir. “A 25% increase in the number of homes for sale is providing home buyers with more selection and reducing the chances of competing bids on the same property.”

March MLS® residential sales volume fell 12.4% to $3.48 billion compared to March 2007. Residential unit sales declined 22% to 7,128 units in March, while the average MLS® residential price increased 12.3% to $488,796 compared to March 2007.

[Read More....]

Blogger has to defend himself on first Lhasa reports, photos

Kadfly, the American blogger who happened to be in Lhasa when the riots broke out in March and who shot all the important photos of the riots which were then used by Reuters, NYT etc, has been under attack for b×××sh*ting for not standing on the side of Tibetans. He was also accused by some messages left on his blog that question if he was an agent for the Chinese government. He recently defended himself in a post:

(on the video) The man initially rode up Beijing Donglu slowly, with apparently no idea of what was happening. When an initial stone was thrown at him, he slowed his bike down and stared behind him quite naturally, probably wondering why anyone would throw a rock at him. That is when he realized the entire street was trying to peg him, and he sped up for a few seconds before coming to a complete stop and pleaded with the crowd on the north side of the street to stop attacking him. This is when the other man rushes up to him and the video begins.

Afterwards when we were in the hotel we also wondered how the crowd was able to identify this man as Chinese. Some believed that the crowd were basically attacking anything that drove past but I remember seeing a truck drive through Beijing Street that no one stoned and people actually waved at, so in my opinion the crowd was able to tell between friend and foe somehow. I think it is very possible the man-with-the-knife is an undercover police officer but I am less sure about the motorcyclist attack being staged (unless the main attackers were undercover police officers just attacking an innocent bystander to get the crowd riled up). The attack was vicious and brutal, and very similar to the attack that left the man in the suit bleeding on the ground a few minutes later (there's a picture of him from "Willie" in the original 'Lhasa Burning' post). It seemed like everyone on the street were throwing stones at the motorcyclist, so unless they all were Chinese agents I have trouble believing it was staged (though only a few people took part in the more vicious hand-to-hand assault). I suspect maybe the way he was dressed or the type of bike he was riding tipped the crowd off to his identity, or the fact he had a helmet, when very few Tibetans use one according to the YouTube expose on Jotman's post. Or maybe the crowd really were just attacking everyone and everything and somehow the truck had managed to communicate it was on their side, or they had been throwing stones at it and I just didn't see this. Anyways, after he escaped the attack apparently the man went back to retrieve his bike but it was taken from him again and one of the bigger fires was then started using it ("Willie" witnessed this, not me).
This is what he has to say about "media bias":
I wouldn't say I believe Western news organizations actively lied about what happened in Tibet. I will stick with the weaker position that they certainly did not actively try to report all parts of the story. That the rioters were violent was not well reported in the initial hours (and to an extent, still isn't): there was much more emphasis on the Chinese crackdown when to our knowledge, they did not even yet have basic control of large parts of the city. No matter what, I think the evidence against the Western media isn't good: they have definitely cropped pictures that have given the protests a more peaceful feel (I'm thinking of the infamous trucks photo) and they have definitely used pictures of Nepalese riot police responding with force against Tibetans in stories about what was happening in Tibet. Sure, the Chinese news agencies might be doing the very same (if not worse), but as I have said to Blogdai, I and others rightfully hold the Western news media to a higher standard.
It made me uncomfortable to learn that this young man, Kadfly, would have received so many negative responses for only reporting on what he saw. Does that mean the pro-Tibet sect cannot admit they have done anything wrong? Does that mean that they believe the level of violence should be accepted?

Having said that, though, as I wrote my buddy's blog UglyChineseCanadians, the blindness I recently see in those “patriotics” also scares me. Their nerves are so sensitive that anyone who express a slight variation from what they say would be considered “traitors”. (believe it or not, Jin Jing, the one-legged woman fencer who protected the torch with her body, who had been hailed as a "hero" and an "angel", was declared a "traitor" by Chinese netizens recently after she talked to Reuters, expressing she's against boycotting French store Carrefour.)

This kind of irrational patriotism is the last thing we want to see. It’s stupid and destructive. And it reminds me of the Boxer Rebellion during the end of the Qing dynasty. I’m against the media bias thing too. But the recent crazy patriotic sentiments of the Chinese is making me nervous.

BTW, here's a good and balanced piece of commentary published on The Guardian's website:
China's incompetence in its treatment of the crisis in Tibet should come as no surprise. The Chinese regime is, quite simply, a victim of its inability to reform itself. China saw in the Olympics a symbolic opportunity to consolidate and celebrate its new status in the world. Caught by surprise in Tibet, and by the virulence and popularity of what they described as "anti-Chinese" sentiments, China's rulers have resorted to the traditional tools of authoritarian regimes, turning their citizens' deep nationalism and sense of humiliation against western critics.

....

But the west's hypocrisy nearly matches the Chinese regime's incompetence. The moment the international community "bestowed" the Olympics on China, the west demonstrated how little consideration it actually gives to human rights and democracy. The idea that the Chinese regime would quickly reform the country into an open, moderate, and benevolent giant was either a fraud, a gigantic misperception, or wishful thinking.

The dilemma posed by China for democratic regimes is understandable. Caught between their desperate need for finance and markets and their need to respond to their citizens' sentiments, they oscillate between condemnation and reassurance of China, struggling to find a coherent path that defends the West's principles without damaging its economic interests.

[Read More....]

China blamed for master-minding patriotic protests

The Times of India published an editorial title "Counter View: Chinese have a right to protest". Quite interesting.

....Although the protests may be stage-managed, as some have suggested, there is every indication that the depth of nationalistic fervour in China has taken even the government by surprise. Restraint is being urged at every step, though the government has stopped short of outright condemnation. In any case, these protests are as legitimate as those in Paris or London. Portraying the outcry as merely a sham is to ignore the danger that an alienated China poses to the world. If the Chinese are feeling offended, perhaps it is time for the rest of the world to try to understand their grievance.

Pushing China into a corner is unlikely to help the world. It will merely achieve a growth in militant Nationalism that will, in a sense, allow the government to continue its human rights violations. In other words, an image of China as a nation beset by unfair attacks might lead to it becoming even more hostile to the views of the western world.

The divide between how the Chinese view themselves and how they are perceived in the world should be narrowed instead of making it wider. It will be wise, therefore, to engage China on different terms and avoid tensions from spiralling out of hand over the Olympics, which the Chinese are justifiably proud of being called upon to host.
Compared to a commentary appeared in Time:
The biggest risk for the Chinese government is that the protests simmer until the Beijing Summer Olympics begin in August. The authorities hope to show the world how China has changed in the three decades since Deng Xiaoping launched economic reforms. But it will be difficult to present a friendly, progressive face to the world if citizens are indulging in anti-foreign antics.
Okay.

When Chinese protest, it's indulgence. When Tibetans protest, it's for freedom.

This is how the Wall Street Journal portrays the protests:
Condemnation of Chinese government policies is being received in China as attacking the nation as a whole, arousing public resentment. The most vocal responses are seen overseas as government-sanctioned nationalism run amok, further reinforcing negative images of China.
When Chinese protest, they further reinforce negative images of China. When Tibetans protest, they put China's human rights record into the light.

From NYT:
In a sign that the government was still allowing anti-foreign sentiment to spill over into rare street demonstrations, thousands of people rallied on Sunday in front of Carrefour markets in six cities, including two, Harbin and Jinan, where there had not been protests earlier.

...In recent days, the government has called on citizens to temper their fury at the West, but it has not acted to halt public demonstrations, which have been stoked by newspaper editorials, Internet postings and text messages sent to millions of cellphones.

On Sunday, the state-run People’s Daily newspaper called for a cooling of passions, although it stopped short of condemning the demonstrations or the spreading boycott campaign against French goods. “As citizens, we have the responsibility to express our patriotic enthusiasm calmly and rationally and express patriotic aspiration in an orderly and legal manner,” the newspaper said in a front-page editorial.
When Chinese protest -- peacefully -- they are brainwashed nationalists. When Tibetans protest -- violently -- they are fighters against oppression.

When China says the Dalai Lama is behind the Lhasa riots, it is China's attempt to vilify His Holiness. When Chinese protest, it is China who master-minding the whole thing.

So what do you want? You want to see the protesting Chinese being shot down as the way the Tibetan propaganda told you the Tibetans were? (I'm not saying China's state-owned media aren't hammering out propaganda. But please be aware that propaganda is from both sides; another article on propaganda in here.)

As the above Times of India editorial suggests, many westerns still believe these massive protests are sponsored by the Chinese government. The Chinese are still being seen as brainwashed nationalists with no ability to think independently. How sad.

On the Tibet issue, WSJ says:
Protests advocating Tibetan independence mystify most Chinese, who have been taught all their lives that Tibet has long been part of China. And the deeply emotional Chinese response to the Tibet protests has also surprised some Westerners.
The western media should also asked if they have been taught all their lives that Tibet has never been part of China.

The following paragraph seems to be used as balancing, but the phrase "albeit still limited" is still judgemental. "Limited" in what standard? Who set those standards? Why can't you reflect on the fact that China has made a lot of progress in merely 30 years? Compare the current state with what it was.... not comparing with the West who has enjoyed industrialization and economic development for over 100 years.
Many Chinese who are critical of their own government also feel Western condemnations of China fail to acknowledge its advances in recent decades, from lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty to expanding the freedoms -- albeit still limited -- that Chinese enjoy.
To the West: please try to understand why we are angry. Think about if you were us.

More readings:
China should be careful in making use of nationalistic feelings
Han Chinese not humans?
A big blue earth for all of us
Have the media missed the real Tibet story?
Here's maybe proof of 'orchestrated violence' in Tibet

[Read More....]

Mind it: it's propaganda from BOTH sides

Daily Kos wrote an in-depth investigation into how the US and Tibetans might have successfully hammered out a propaganda. Please read the article in full here. Really worth reading, no matter which side you're on. (Thx David in Niagara Falls for the link)

The propaganda war is on and there are two sides to this coin.

Point in fact for the purpose of this discussion: The Chinese media is controlled by the communist government. No question. Do they use their media to further their cause? Certainly.

Who is on the other side of the coin?
You may be surprised...

This is where the news is fed....

The Chinese are not particularly good at propaganda outside of their sphere of influence. Their expertise is to control the narrative by shutting down sources of information internally. In these times of immediate access to damn near every iota of information, this is a losing battle for the Chinese.

The stifling of information also gives any opposition opportunity to fill the void with their "ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause".

As a result, it is difficult to get information out of Tibet. We are forced to rely on other sources. The leading source of "information" from Tibet and into Tibet is Radio Free Asia (RFA).
From here, Daily Kose presented his/her investigation. It's a long and thorough piece, so please be patient reading through the end.

[Read More....]

Messing Torch Run plan starts in May 2007!

German-Foreign-Policy.com also published a shocking article detailing backroom events leading up to the Lhasa uprising and recent Olympic torch run disruption. I begin to believe that there may be some credits in China's claims that the uprising and torch run mess are orchestrated by the "Dalai Clique". After all, if things covered in this article are true, the Chinese Communists aren't that evil.

BTW, the Globe and Mail earlier reported that:

Last May, the Dalai Lama's Tibetan government-in-exile put together a meeting in Brussels of all the major Tibet organizations — there are hundreds, and they're organized under a Washington-based umbrella group, the International Tibet Support Network. There, the exiled Tibetans decided that the Olympics should be the single focus of their activities for the next 15 months, and they hired a full-time organizer for the Olympic-disruption campaign.
Let's go back to the German-Foreign-Policy.com article:
  • Conference reports and the research of a Canadian journalist reveal that a German Foreign Ministry front organization is playing a decisive role in the preparations of the anti-Chinese Tibet campaign.
  • According to this information, the campaign is being orchestrated from a Washington based headquarters. It had been assigned the task of organizing worldwide "protests" at a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (affiliated with the German Free Democratic Party - FDP) in May 2007.
  • The plans were developed with the collaboration of the US State Department and the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile and call for high profile actions along the route of the Olympic Torch Relay and are supposed to reach a climax in August during the games in Beijing.
  • The campaign began already last summer and is now profiting from the current uprising in the west of the People's Republic of China that is receiving prominent coverage in the German media. The uprising was initiated with murderous pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetan members of the population, including the Muslim Chinese minority. Numerous deaths of non-Tibetans provoked a reaction of the Chinese security forces.
  • According to the research by a Canadian journalist, a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (FNSt) gave the impetus to the current anti-Chinese Tibet campaign that violently forced the interruption of the Olympian Torch Relay in Paris last Monday. The conference was the fifth "International Tibet Support Groups Conference," that was held from May 11 - 14, 2007 in Brussels.
  • According to FNSt information this conference was supposed to do nothing other than the four preceding conferences - "coordinate the work of the international Tibet groups and consolidate the links between them with the central Tibetan Government in Exile."
  • The German foundation, which is largely state financed, began the conference preparations in March 2005, and coordinated its plans with the Dalai Lama at his headquarters in the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile in Dharamsala, India. More than 300 participants from 56 countries, 36 Tibetan associations and 145 Tibet support groups were represented at the conference.
  • After several days of consultations the conference ended with a concerted "plan of action". The paper is entitled "Roadmap for the Tibet Movement for the Coming Years" covering four areas of interest: "political support for negotiations", "human rights", "environment and development" and "the 2008 Olympic games in Beijing."
  • The results of the conference are directed to the Tibetan people as well as "their supporters around the world." Rolf Berndt, a member of the FNSt's executive council in Brussels, declared that the Olympic Games "are an excellent opportunity" to publicly promote the cause of the "Tibet Movement". The conference participants agreed to make the Olympics the single focus of attack for their activities for the next 15 months.[6] They hired a full-time organizer for their campaign, who has since been directing the worldwide Tibet actions from their Washington headquarters.
  • The anti-Chinese Tibet campaign, initiated under the direction of a German Foreign Ministry front organization (Friedrich Naumann Foundation) and a high-ranking representative of the US State Department, is developing its full efficacy in the aftermath of the uprisings in West People's Republic of China that began only a few days before the start of the Torch Relay.
  • The pogrom-like mob-violence not only created the necessary media profile for the current Tibet campaign, initiated with the help of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, it also permits an insight into the character of Tibetan separatism. The "prime minister" of the Tibetan "Exile Government," who had participated in the formulation of the plan of action at the May 2007 Tibet Conference in Brussels, had already at the end of the 1990s, expounded in the German media on his views of the future of non-Tibetans, who had immigrated to Tibet over the past 50 years. In the case of a successful secession, they will have to "return to China, or if they would like to remain, be treated as foreigners."

  • He explained the planned measures: "they will, in any case, not be allowed to participate in the political life." The prospect of discrimination against all non-Tibetan members of the population was anticipated in mid-March by mobs in their bloody attacks on Chinese and members of the Muslim minority.

[Read More....]

Anti-Free-Tibet opinions are not tolerated in the West: German experts

German-Foreign-Policy.com, an independent online publication by journalists and social scientists, reveals in an article how the US and Germany have cooperated in using Tibet to weaken and destabilize China, a rising power deemed a threat to the West. This article tells us how the whole "Free Tibet" movement was created in and manipulated by the US-Germany axis.

  • Not least among the consequences, the Tibet campaign is also stimulating an anti-Chinese atmosphere in Germany leaving a dwindling amount of room for criticism. Opinions that are at variance with the anti-Beijing mainstream are, in the meantime, being punished. In Cologne a sinologist's lecture on the theme of Tibet had to be cancelled at the last minute. The organizers had criticized the one-sided western media reporting and sought to initiate a differentiated debate of the conflict. This intention led to the cancellation on short notice of the rental contract for the location in the Cologne Community Center. Those responsible for the community center made it known that no "anti-Tibetan" events would be tolerated.
  • Several front organizations of German foreign policy have for years been supporting the Tibetan exile structures in Dharamsala, India. This includes support for organizational measures enabling the "government in exile" in Dharamsala to orchestrate its activities against the People's Republic of China worldwide. Particularly the Free Democratic Party (FDP) affiliated Friedrich Naumann Foundation and the Heinrich Boell Foundation (affiliated with the Green Party) are cooperating with the "government in exile" and other exile Tibetan institutions.
  • Front organizations of US foreign policy are working toward the same objectives. Already in the 1950s Washington was intervening in Tibet with millions of dollars, at the time, even supporting Tibetan armed uprisings against the People's Republic of China. German organizations took up the question of Tibet around the end of the 80s, at a time when China was beginning its rise to become a global competitor of the west. The current activities are apt to greatly weaken China. These supplement other German-US measures aimed at thwarting the rise of their East-Asian rival.
  • The US logistical and military support for the armed Tibetan rebellions, beginning in 1957, was aimed at destabilizing the communist government. The intervention outlasted the Dalai Lama's flight into exile in Dharamsala, India, where, after 1959, a Tibetan "government in exile" was called into being. According to official documents from the government in Washington, during the 1960s the CIA was paying up to $1.7 million per year to maintain "operations against China." Up to $180,000 was given directly to the Dalai Lama.
  • German organizations have become intensively engaged in the Tibet question since the 1980s, when the People's Republic of China began an economic upswing that has now placed it in the top ranks of global commercial statistics. Already at that time political strategists were predicting the possibility of China's rise to becoming a major power and foresaw rivalry between China and western powers. Using contacts to Tibet by "alternative" political circles, who had converted to Buddhism, the Green parliamentary group, through hearings and parliamentary resolutions, placed the questions of autonomy and the demands for secession in that region of China on the political agenda of the Bundestag in 1985.
  • Tsewang Norbu, a former assistant of the Dalai Lama, helped shape policy on Tibet, first as an employee of the Green parliamentarian Petra Kelly and, since 1992, as an employee of the Green Party affiliated Heinrich Boell Foundation. In addition, Norbu founded the German-Tibetan Cultural Society and, over an extended period of time, presided as its vice-chairman. He also works as a "special correspondent" for the US financed "Radio Free Asia" (RFA). RFA is among the news sources of western reporting on the recent uprising in Tibet.
  • German foundations' activities around Tibet touch one of the most sensitive spots in Chinese policy. Not only do they represent interference into the domestic affairs of that nation, they also threaten the People's Republic's territorial integrity. "To a certain extent, Tibet is the cornerstone of a fragile multi-ethnic state," writes a policy advisor at the Institute of Asian Studies of the German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA) in Hamburg. "A horror scenario for Beijing is that beginning with Tibet, a conflagration develops." One finds "designated on a map published in a 1990 autobiography of the Dalai Lama (...) alongside Greater Tibet also 'East Turkestan,' as the area where Moslem Uygurs settled, Inner Mongolia and Manchuria."[11] The secession of these regions would have drastic consequences: "the remaining Chinese settled areas would have shrunk to a third of the People's Republic."
  • In fact, the current Tibet campaign, with the participation of German organizations, is but an example of Berlin's and Washington's growing anti-Chinese policy. In Africa, Germany and the USA are now openly agitating against China. Aggressive competition is being practiced also in Latin America as well as in Central Asia. India is seen as a possible counter-balance for the containment of the People's Republic.

[Read More....]

Here's maybe proof of 'orchestrated violence' in Tibet

Slowly, we are getting more rational analyses from the West looking at what really might have happened in the recent riots in Lhasa and its adjacent areas. This compilation might look long, but it contains the most insightful research and most convincing analysis I've seen so far after days and nights of researching on the topic. I hope this post will help many readers better understand the Tibet issue as well as the reasons behind the recent Tibetan riots and disruption of the torch run.

Richard M Bennett is an intelligence and security consultant, AFI Research. He recently wrote in Asia Times and Journey to the East exploring the possibility of an "orchestrated plan" to recent riots in Tibet, which was planned by the international Free Tibet movement and the US intelligence.

China has been accusing the Dalai Lama of orchestrating the riots. However, the accusation remains in the rhetoric but China has been charged for "demonizing" the Dalai Lama because China did not present any proof. Bennett's analysis may provide a glimpse of what may have happened.

Given the historical context of the unrest in Tibet, there is reason to believe Beijing was caught on the hop with the recent demonstrations for the simple reason that their planning took place outside of Tibet and that the direction of the protesters is similarly in the hands of anti-Chinese organizers safely out of reach in Nepal and northern India.

Similarly, the funding and overall control of the unrest has also been linked to Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, and by inference to the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) because of his close cooperation with US intelligence for over 50 years.

Indeed, with the CIA's deep involvement with the Free Tibet Movement and its funding of the suspiciously well-informed Radio Free Asia, it would seem somewhat unlikely that any revolt could have been planned or occurred without the prior knowledge, and even perhaps the agreement, of the National Clandestine Service (formerly known as the Directorate of Operations) at CIA headquarters in Langley.

Respected columnist and former senior Indian Intelligence officer, B Raman, commented on March 21 that "on the basis of available evidence, it was possible to assess with a reasonable measure of conviction" that the initial uprising in Lhasa on March 14 "had been pre-planned and well orchestrated".

Could there be a factual basis to the suggestion that the main beneficiaries to the death and destruction sweeping Tibet are in Washington? History would suggest that this is a distinct possibility.


F. William Engdahl recently wrote in Canada-based Global Research that George W. Bush is playing geopolitical game with China as "part of an escalating US strategy of destabilization of China which has been initiated by the Bush Administration over the past months."

Engdahl describes that Washington is playing the 'Tibet Roulette' with China.

As the Chinese government itself was clear to point out, the sudden eruption of anti-Chinese violence in Tibet, a new phase in the movement led by the exiled Dalai Lama, was suspiciously timed to try to put the spotlight on Beijing's human rights record on the eve of the coming Olympics. The Beijing Olympics are an event seen in China as a major acknowledgement of the arrival of a new prosperous China on the world stage.

The background actors in the Tibet "Crimson revolution" actions confirm that Washington has been working overtime in recent months to prepare another of its infamous Color Revolutions, these fanning public protests designed to inflict maximum embarrassment on Beijing. The actors on the ground in and outside Tibet are the usual suspects, tied to the US State Department, including the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the CIA's Freedom House through its chairman, Bette Bao Lord and her role in the International Committee for Tibet, as well as the Trace Foundation financed by the wealth of George Soros through his daughter, Andrea Soros Colombel.

Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao has accused the Dalai Lama of orchestrating the latest unrest to sabotage the Olympic Games "in order to achieve their unspeakable goal", Tibetan independence.

Bush telephoned his Chinese counterpart, President Hu Jintao, to pressure for talks between Beijing and the exiled Dalai Lama. The White House said that Bush, "raised his concerns about the situation in Tibet and encouraged the Chinese government to engage in substantive dialogue with the Dalai Lama's representatives and to allow access for journalists and diplomats."

President Hu reportedly told Bush the Dalai Lama must "stop his sabotage" of the Olympics before Beijing takes a decision on talks with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang said.

In fact, a colleague of mine did a research last night and discovered that the lamas who were responsible for stirring up the riots were all of the "Yellow Hats" sect, which is directly under the Dalai Lama. Some "Black Hats" lamas refused to participate were even threatened by their Yellow Hats colleagues.

Engdahl continues to analyze:

The events in Tibet since March 10 have been played in Western media with little regard to accuracy or independent cross-checking. Most of the pictures blown up in European and US newspapers and TV have not even been of Chinese military oppression of Tibetan lamas or monks. They have been shown to be in most cases either Reuters or AFP pictures of Han Chinese being beaten by Tibetan monks in paramilitary organizations. In some instances German TV stations ran video pictures of beatings that were not even from Tibet but rather by Nepalese police in Kathmandu.

The western media complicity simply further underlies that the actions around Tibet are part of a well-orchestrated destabilization effort on the part of Washington. What few people realize is that the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was also instrumental, along with Gene Sharp's misnamed Albert Einstein Institution through Colonel Robert Helvey, in encouraging the student protests at Tiananmen Square in June 1989. The Albert Einstein Institution, as it describes itself, specializes in "nonviolence as a form of warfare."

Colonel Helvey was formerly with the Defense Intelligence Agency stationed in Myanmar. Helvey trained in Hong Kong the student leaders from Beijing in mass demonstration techniques which they were to use in the Tiananmen Square incident of June 1989. He is now believed acting as an adviser to the Falun Gong in similar civil disobedience techniques. Helvey nominally retired from the army in 1991, but had been working with the Albert Einstein Institution and George Soros' Open Society Foundation long before then. In its annual report for 2004 Helvey's Albert Einstein Institution admitted to advising people in Tibet.

Ultimately, here's why the US has to destabilize China:

Washington policy has used and refined these techniques of "revolutionary nonviolence," and NED operations embodied a series of ‘democratic' or soft coup projects as part of a larger strategy which would seek to cut China off from access to its vital external oil and gas reserves.

The 1970's quote attributed to then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a proponent of British geopolitics in an American context comes to mind: "If you control the oil you control entire nations…"

The destabilization attempt by Washington using Tibet, no doubt with quiet "help" from its friends in British and other US-friendly intelligence services, is part of a clear pattern.

It includes Washington's "Saffron revolution" attempts to destabilize Myanmar. It includes the ongoing effort to get NATO troops into Darfur to block China's access to strategically vital oil resources there and elsewhere in Africa. It includes attempts to foment problems in Uzbekistan, Kyrgystan and to disrupt China's vital new energy pipeline projects to Kazakhstan. The earlier Asian Great Silk Road trade routes went through Tashkent in Uzbekistan and Almaty in Kazakhstan for geographically obvious reasons, in a region surrounded by major mountain ranges. Geopolitical control of Uzbekistan, Kyrgystan, Kazakhstan would enable control of any potential pipeline routes between China and Central Asia just as the encirclement of Russia controls pipeline and other ties between it and western Europe, China, India and the Middle East, where China depends on uninterrupted oil flows from Iran, Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries.

What is behind the strategy to encircle China? Engdahl says:

In this context, a revealing New York Council on Foreign Relations analysis in their Foreign Affairs magazine from Zbigniew Brzezinski from September/October 1997 is worth quoting. Brzezinski, a protégé of David Rockefeller and a follower of the founder of British geopolitics, Sir Halford Mackinder, is today the foreign policy adviser to Presidential candidate, Barack Obama. In 1997 he revealingly wrote:

‘Eurasia is home to most of the world's politically assertive and dynamic states. All the historical pretenders to global power originated in Eurasia. The world's most populous aspirants to regional hegemony, China and India, are in Eurasia, as are all the potential political or economic challengers to American primacy. After the United States, the next six largest economies and military spenders are there, as are all but one of the world's overt nuclear powers, and all but one of the covert ones. Eurasia accounts for 75% of the world's population; 60% of its GNP, and 75% of its energy resources. Collectively, Eurasia's potential power overshadows even America's.

‘Eurasia is the world's axial super-continent. A power that dominated Eurasia would exercise decisive influence over two of the world's three most economically productive regions, Western Europe and East Asia. A glance at the map also suggests that a country dominant in Eurasia would almost automatically control the Middle East and Africa. With Eurasia now serving as the decisive geopolitical chessboard, it no longer suffices to fashion one policy for Europe and another for Asia. What happens with the distribution of power on the Eurasian landmass will be of decisive importance to America's global primacy….".

This statement, written well before the US-led bombing of former Yugoslavia and the US military occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq, or its support of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline, puts Washington pronouncements about ‘ridding the world of tyranny' and about spreading democracy, into a somewhat different context from the one usually mentioned by George W. Bush of others.

It's about global hegemony, not democracy. It should be no surprise when powers such as China are not convinced that giving Washington such overwhelming power is in China's national interest, any more than Russia thinks that it would be a step towards peace to let NATO gobble up Ukraine and Georgia and put US missiles on Russia's doorstep "to defend against threat of Iranian nuclear attack on the United States."

The US-led destabilization in Tibet is part of a strategic shift of great significance. It comes at a time when the US economy and the US dollar, still the world's reserve currency, are in the worst crisis since the 1930's. It is significant that the US Administration sends Wall Street banker, former Goldman Sachs chairman, Henry Paulson to Beijing in the midst of its efforts to embarrass Beijing in Tibet. Washington is literally playing with fire. China long ago surpassed Japan as the world's largest holder of foreign currency reserves, now in the range of $1.5 trillions, most of which are invested in US Treasury debt instruments. Paulson knows well that were Beijing to decide it could bring the dollar to its knees by selling only a small portion of its US debt on the market.

Copyrights are those of the authors. These paragraphs are posted here only for the readers' convenience.

[Read More....]

Gazette: Western media unfair to China

Montreal Gazette - Thousands of Chinese found they were able to access the BBC News website for the first time last week after years of strict censorship. Emails from these new readers flooded into the BBC. Much to the surprise of its editors, most of the comments were critical of their coverage.

The negative feedback so shocked the BBC that its Asia bureau chief Paul Danahar, who is based in Beijing, felt it necessary to respond to this criticism and explain the BBC's challenges of reporting in China.

Danahar acknowledged that the BBC's reporting on Tibet drew much ire from Chinese readers. He defended the BBC by pointing out that it was the first foreign broadcaster to obtain pictures showing the ethnic violence against Han Chinese by Tibetans in Lhasa. He claimed that as a direct result of the BBC's broadcast of these pictures, the Dalai Lama called for an end to the violence.

Not mentioned in his article is the fact that before the publication of these pictures, the Western media were uniform in their condemnation of Chinese brutality and the crackdown. Even after the pictures' publication, the West is still critical of China's handling of the situation in Tibet.

When casualty figures were reported, Chinese official figures were put in juxtaposition with the figures provided by the Tibetan government in exile, always worded in a fashion that suggested the official figures are less trustworthy. What is not clear is that if the Dalai Lama learned of the Tibetan violence against ethnic Chinese only through BBC broadcasts, how was he able to provide any casualty figures?

Our own media are not immune to this bias when it comes to China. Reports of faulty toys, trade imbalance, labour practices, environmental issues, paint China as a hellish place. Reports of economic boom, military build-up and nationalistic sentiments describe China as a menacing superpower soon to challenge the West for a dominant and dominating position in the world.

The result of all this sensationalist, biased reporting is a very badly understood China.

The cover of a recent issue of Maclean's magazine showed a police officers beating up an escaping Tibetan monk. Splashed across are these words: "Butchers and Monsters," promoting an article written by John Fraser titled: "The brutality in Tibet is no surprise. Communist China will never change."

The article was a standard anti-China diatribe. The author is, however, entitled to his opinion. What was disingenuous about the picture is that the policeman in question was not Chinese. In a small caption at the bottom of the picture, the magazine acknowledged that the photo depicted a Nepali police chasing away a Tibetan demonstrator in Katmandu.

China's population size makes it a formidable economic entity. In reality, China is a poor Third World country just starting out on its road to development. At this beginning stage of development, it encounters much systemic difficulty. Its political system is totalitarian although no longer communist except in name; it lacks a well developed judicial system; there is rampant corruption; labour standards are minimal and recent. These problems need to be acknowledged, criticized and corrected. However, we need to understand that they cannot be corrected overnight.

China's Tibet policy can be seen only in this context. It is not a perfect policy. It might even be a bad policy. It is however a policy derived from a national objective of economic development. As a nation, China and its people have elected to rid themselves of poverty by embracing market reform. Along with success, however, economic development has also brought an increasing income gap, environmental degradation and rampant corruption. In Tibet, these negative consequences might well have been magnified through the lens of ethnic tension.

Here in the West, we need to recognize that the negative consequences of China's development need to be solved gradually but persistently through continued dialogue and engagement. Reporting should be balanced rather than sensational.

Ethnic-based riots and violence should be condemned. Dialogue between the Dalai Lama and Beijing should be championed.

Finally, a word on the Olympics and the call for boycott by some in the West. China's handling of Tibet, though often hamhanded, has basically stayed the same over the last 20 years. It has certainly not worsened since the Olympic committee awarded the Games to Beijing.

Ethnic riots planned by some Tibetans with a certain political objective have been quite effective with the help of sympathetic Western media. However, any boycott of the Games or its opening ceremony will be interpreted by the Chinese people (ordinary people who are understandably proud of their collective achievement) as hypocritical and antagonistic.

A confident, prosperous, and accepted China is more likely to become a liberal democracy than a humiliated, rejected, and paranoid People's Republic.

By John Chen, associate professor of medicine at McGill University.

More readings:
Western media bias and 'Tibetan complex'
Global TV fabrication
CTV, TorStar blasted for biased reporting on Tibet issue
We demand honesty from our 'free' press: activist
Mainstream media bias against China is live and thriving: US tourist
Biased media reports 'unite all Chinese'